<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter allowed in the Courtroom&#8230;. for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:10:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Policastro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Young Media in an Old City</title>
		<link>http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Policastro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Young Media in an Old City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onqsm.com/?p=167#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] to the rest of their coverage.  Local news site Baltimore Brew chronicled the exchange.  Quinton updated the post to clarify the courtroom ban and downplayed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the rest of their coverage.  Local news site Baltimore Brew chronicled the exchange.  Quinton updated the post to clarify the courtroom ban and downplayed the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun reporters defend their Dixon coverage from charges it wasn&#8217;t. . . Tweeted enough?! - Baltimore Brew</title>
		<link>http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun reporters defend their Dixon coverage from charges it wasn&#8217;t. . . Tweeted enough?! - Baltimore Brew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onqsm.com/?p=167#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...]      &#8220;More than one person I’ve discussed this with has mentioned that the Sun is really dropping the ball on trial coverage. I would tend to agree,&#8221; Quinton had written. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]      &#8220;More than one person I’ve discussed this with has mentioned that the Sun is really dropping the ball on trial coverage. I would tend to agree,&#8221; Quinton had written. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The state rests &#8211; but technology doesn&#8217;t &#8211; news liveblogged from the Dixon trial - Baltimore Brew</title>
		<link>http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>The state rests &#8211; but technology doesn&#8217;t &#8211; news liveblogged from the Dixon trial - Baltimore Brew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onqsm.com/?p=167#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] were some reports that there was tension in the press corps over liveblogging, with print journalists sticking to the court&#8217;s &#8220;no texting in the courtroom&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were some reports that there was tension in the press corps over liveblogging, with print journalists sticking to the court&#8217;s &#8220;no texting in the courtroom&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; “Twitter Allowed in the [Maryland State] Courtroom …. for Now”</title>
		<link>http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; “Twitter Allowed in the [Maryland State] Courtroom …. for Now”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onqsm.com/?p=167#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Quinton on the OnQ Social Media Consulting blog has a report, with links to journalist tweets on the subject. Compare this federal case barring Twitter reporting of a trial, though that one is under federal rules that generally ban broadcasting of trials.   Categories: Uncategorized&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Quinton on the OnQ Social Media Consulting blog has a report, with links to journalist tweets on the subject. Compare this federal case barring Twitter reporting of a trial, though that one is under federal rules that generally ban broadcasting of trials.   Categories: Uncategorized&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter usage at the Sheila Dixon trial &#124; Inside Charm City: Baltimore, Maryland blog</title>
		<link>http://onqsm.com/2009/11/16/twitter-allowed-in-the-courtroom-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter usage at the Sheila Dixon trial &#124; Inside Charm City: Baltimore, Maryland blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onqsm.com/?p=167#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] usage at the Sheila Dixon trial   I&#8217;ve posted a lengthy piece at OnQ Social Media discussing most of the issues going this week regarding Twitter and the trial of Baltimore Mayor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] usage at the Sheila Dixon trial   I&#8217;ve posted a lengthy piece at OnQ Social Media discussing most of the issues going this week regarding Twitter and the trial of Baltimore Mayor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
